{"id":"W2291589275","doi":"10.1111/cgf.12809","title":"S<scp>mart</scp>C<scp>anvas</scp>: Context‐inferred Interpretation of Sketches for Preparatory Design Studies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Graphics Forum","topic":"3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Abstraction; Object (grammar); Human–computer interaction; Process (computing); Interpretation (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Engineering drawing; Computer graphics (images); Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007938589,0.000280188,0.0004391691,0.0001403087,0.0002295237,0.00006274305,0.0003647291,0.0001417809,0.000007288573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004527392,0.000182843,0.0002346646,0.0002409757,0.0002917928,0.0004224376,0.0000425569,0.0001060101,0.00003856823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007670339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005596889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000386508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006974531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981079,0.0002336499,0.0004624602,0.0004241409,0.0002665909,0.0005052412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951509,0.003865859,0.0002484888,0.0002891766,0.0003110107,0.0001345401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009179486,0.0001285192,0.6309734,0.0003821436,0.0009251364,0.00001219502,0.01092182,0.0007741438,0.0005009117,0.002800683,0.1663541,0.1861351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006325273,0.006994977,0.6058457,0.001956028,0.0003743091,0.00005775966,0.01203246,0.1777336,0.01252788,0.06731954,0.1080437,0.0007887972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7938731,0.006838464,0.1956514,0.0001476033,0.001768203,0.0008348148,0.0002255287,0.0001969598,0.0004639317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961156,0.0002778845,0.002552203,0.0003392887,0.0001194432,0.00001627931,0.00005482675,0.00001122287,0.0005132335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2022426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7456121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05121712814827403,"score_gpt":0.259856699450648,"score_spread":0.208639571302374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}