{"id":"W2291959820","doi":"10.30955/gnj.000890","title":"An extreme analysis for the 2010 precipitation event at the South of Saskatchewan Prairie","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global NEST Journal","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Global Institute for Water Security","funders":"","keywords":"Gumbel distribution; Precipitation; Generalized extreme value distribution; Boreal; Environmental science; Geography; Flood myth; Climatology; Extreme value theory; Distribution (mathematics); Return period; Physical geography; Statistics; Meteorology; Mathematics; Geology; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006789884,0.0001004514,0.000152655,0.00002105251,0.000496892,0.00004943527,0.0003866603,0.00006309379,0.003463675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004549046,0.00005110171,0.0002771724,0.0004628161,0.00025079,0.0002371209,0.00006305428,0.0001072214,0.0001707166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001067132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002060892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001061525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009613927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988868,0.0001473026,0.0002856361,0.00015813,0.0002977903,0.0002242935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991965,0.00009510318,0.0002788088,0.0002951945,0.00003571093,0.00009872238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005007998,0.0000825133,0.8867342,0.000001253548,0.0004859942,0.000001111609,0.00213125,0.09643614,0.0006434222,0.00001605083,0.00672602,0.006692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002472762,0.00009932028,0.9669425,0.000001627166,0.0009406187,0.00002380551,0.001953851,0.02581463,0.00008065187,0.002290491,0.001513851,0.00009131602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9645261,0.0001102252,0.03095091,0.003775892,0.0001245955,0.0001979715,0.00001782852,0.00000626882,0.0002901726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982383,0.000005443508,0.0005995485,0.0002535103,0.00008288352,0.00001777443,0.000008052766,0.000003476773,0.0007910373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08020839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01386767161909775,"score_gpt":0.2486844199407275,"score_spread":0.2348167483216298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}