{"id":"W2292251119","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.02.034","title":"Hamilton׳s Rule in finite populations with synergistic interactions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Generalization; Population; Transitive relation; Inclusive fitness; Selection (genetic algorithm); Frequency-dependent selection; Mathematics; Homogeneous; Binary number; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Biology; Evolutionary biology; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001303418,0.0003279743,0.001464593,0.0006384447,0.0009100058,0.001409895,0.001924037,0.001884858,0.00381289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006436766,0.0003552313,0.0007438931,0.0006300915,0.002128559,0.001744971,0.0008838906,0.001375504,0.0005630857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000794702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001434039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00441975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003813427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993067,0.0002606199,0.00004080488,0.0001177338,0.000177101,0.00009691819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964465,0.002345482,0.0002394907,0.0002852775,0.0004135936,0.0002696169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003536279,0.00003710582,0.0007627752,0.00007310665,0.00005014474,0.0004158684,0.0001780631,0.04692536,0.001074285,0.9395643,0.002631868,0.008251728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006700461,0.00002154126,0.0003593214,0.0000104325,0.0000215306,0.0001635923,0.0000470367,0.153142,0.0001801702,0.8449677,0.001000843,0.00001878335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3433136,0.000820271,0.5481198,0.003040139,0.0004566077,0.0001967157,0.0003775871,0.0002378935,0.1034374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9255671,0.0005378447,0.04830138,0.0003377975,0.0001732301,0.0001689784,0.0001352633,0.00005810462,0.02472044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00441975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01275533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02220316566027536,"score_gpt":0.3309199546076824,"score_spread":0.3087167889474071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}