{"id":"W2292395334","doi":"10.1109/cdc.2015.7402911","title":"ε-Nash equilibria for partially observed LQG mean field games with major agent: Partial observations by all agents","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Linear-quadratic-Gaussian control; Nash equilibrium; Population; Mean field theory; Mathematics; State (computer science); Multi-agent system; Optimal control; Control theory (sociology); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Control (management); Physics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002557251,0.0001939236,0.0003385148,0.00005677135,0.0001204964,0.0001145106,0.0003359791,0.0001150199,0.000128667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002069755,0.0001942121,0.00009636195,0.0002462021,0.00004177774,0.0002722366,0.00006813544,0.00008180366,0.0001859351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005373127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006901063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000501493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000361351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984699,0.000003394342,0.0005686946,0.000486766,0.00006439447,0.0004068761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998922,0.0000904468,0.0002674123,0.0003801874,0.0001176915,0.0002221906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001290338,0.0002526805,0.007122194,0.00003390866,0.0001114364,0.000001035374,0.0005532464,0.0000588658,0.00008077242,0.9216596,0.06888888,0.001108329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00333203,0.0007388424,0.004272974,0.00002221799,0.00007231226,0.000003025586,0.0002110186,0.02550417,0.0008025296,0.3266467,0.6375625,0.000831755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03889483,0.0004594952,0.9498249,0.004413048,0.0002725085,0.0007779511,0.0004315846,0.0001075355,0.004818205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701484,0.00002642216,0.02131628,0.003215352,0.0003098155,0.001050651,0.0003393871,0.00005757096,0.003536141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9312536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7919739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1549634868144724,"score_gpt":0.2677253905326487,"score_spread":0.1127619037181762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}