{"id":"W2292395334","doi":"10.1109/cdc.2015.7402911","title":"ε-Nash equilibria for partially observed LQG mean field games with major agent: Partial observations by all agents","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Linear-quadratic-Gaussian control; Nash equilibrium; Population; Mean field theory; Mathematics; State (computer science); Multi-agent system; Optimal control; Control theory (sociology); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Control (management); Physics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003283574,0.001598755,0.00169529,0.0007375393,0.0007233435,0.001837502,0.0015948,0.001853307,0.002895886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01378262,0.0007471143,0.001127865,0.0004137481,0.002591279,0.002115365,0.002505972,0.001714458,0.0003566407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001674836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001317329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007114143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004059422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985336,0.0005888539,0.00007286626,0.00037595,0.0002040535,0.000224691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923499,0.005338553,0.001034731,0.0003168706,0.0005927052,0.0003671565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002496109,0.00008245854,0.002376718,0.0001552671,0.0001416902,0.0004153342,0.0003844237,0.7765821,0.002812785,0.2026292,0.0008611639,0.01330923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002920377,0.00005504923,0.0002764587,0.00001238634,0.00001713737,0.00003207712,0.00004638024,0.9396924,0.0003164187,0.05924931,0.0002526625,0.00002042591],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08457586,0.0001877157,0.9100682,0.0005829436,0.00003575455,0.0001147068,0.0001541163,0.0001538301,0.004126814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605469,0.000209916,0.03379906,0.0001741852,0.0000365284,0.0002722955,0.0001273472,0.00003432194,0.004799442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007114143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0173654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1549634868144724,"score_gpt":0.2677253905326487,"score_spread":0.1127619037181762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}