{"id":"W2292413340","doi":"10.1111/imj.13048","title":"Do physicians correctly calculate thromboembolic risk scores? A comparison of concordance between manual and computer‐based calculation of <scp>CHADS<sub>2</sub></scp> and <scp>CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>‐VASc</scp> scores","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Internal Medicine Journal","topic":"Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada","keywords":"Concordance; Medicine; Atrial fibrillation; Antithrombotic; Internal medicine; Stroke (engine); CHA2DS2–VASc score; Risk stratification; Cardiology; Ischemic stroke","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01735776,0.0003307024,0.000616442,0.001900071,0.000298927,0.001390006,0.0007792483,0.000690761,0.001154418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1033695,0.000348689,0.0004729946,0.001273276,0.0006341829,0.0008555648,0.001054979,0.0004189758,0.0009357125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005076518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000553358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003089046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00286947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9798701,0.01127797,0.002494817,0.00239606,0.003478656,0.0004823723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9089055,0.05805629,0.01474113,0.007685612,0.009489098,0.001122375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004153913,0.00007804703,0.9701901,0.0001086984,0.0002082136,0.00007679028,0.001990148,0.0003014474,0.0002989478,0.0001335662,0.002065531,0.02413302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006962526,0.0002316342,0.9881809,0.0001958063,0.00008847644,0.0004752056,0.00130005,0.005644341,0.000644423,0.0003683931,0.002774665,0.00002649248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892645,0.001032585,0.003402811,0.0005633268,0.000149327,0.0001097958,0.0008105432,0.0001117034,0.004555351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997672,0.0001773361,0.001232376,0.0001648452,0.00003436644,0.00003027514,0.0004019199,0.00001808328,0.0002687922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09179777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03097817868967041,"score_gpt":0.3187570914863315,"score_spread":0.2877789127966611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}