{"id":"W2292413340","doi":"10.1111/imj.13048","title":"Do physicians correctly calculate thromboembolic risk scores? A comparison of concordance between manual and computer‐based calculation of <scp>CHADS<sub>2</sub></scp> and <scp>CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>‐VASc</scp> scores","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Internal Medicine Journal","topic":"Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada","keywords":"Concordance; Medicine; Atrial fibrillation; Antithrombotic; Internal medicine; Stroke (engine); CHA2DS2–VASc score; Risk stratification; Cardiology; Ischemic stroke","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001467422,0.000825933,0.002577902,0.001008355,0.0002939171,0.00009106298,0.0003983806,0.0003339835,0.00001080892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001455601,0.0006039516,0.0005030868,0.0006006045,0.001143956,0.0004955708,0.0002685741,0.0009505646,0.0000200094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002115975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001748572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001331059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006331677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993701,0.0004919549,0.002421712,0.0008144819,0.001705027,0.0008658324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922635,0.002744053,0.0030095,0.0005523571,0.0007558793,0.0006747397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001832369,0.00007565716,0.600158,0.0002975302,0.0008067186,0.00005439789,0.001386832,0.0001694664,0.3264839,0.00006593164,0.00471185,0.06560651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008796254,0.002190264,0.6315185,0.00506427,0.001303525,0.0001722954,0.0004761098,0.005402002,0.3440548,0.0004297018,0.0004097541,0.0001824535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523265,0.001829463,0.04266063,0.0005802608,0.001392631,0.0009051159,0.00006640662,0.00009236956,0.0001466228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933221,0.001882782,0.0003243951,0.000259748,0.004013021,0.000006457211,0.00003886123,0.0001116395,0.0000410282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06542405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03097817868967041,"score_gpt":0.3187570914863315,"score_spread":0.2877789127966611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}