{"id":"W2293547265","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.12500","title":"Contrasting effects of spatial heterogeneity and environmental stochasticity on population dynamics of a perennial wildflower","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Population; Spatial heterogeneity; Spatial analysis; Ecology; Vital rates; Spatial variability; Autocorrelation; Population growth; Spatial ecology; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001027275,0.0001654701,0.0002017819,0.0003596497,0.000210012,0.0003768203,0.0002796081,0.0001635026,0.0004284665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001898713,0.000103031,0.0003264803,0.0001933204,0.0003140252,0.0003655731,0.0002791069,0.000212189,0.00003171651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006040832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002319751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008017726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009963715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998224,0.000066409,0.00001278747,0.0000519603,0.00002602299,0.00002050581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998539,0.0009607355,0.0002543439,0.00009359905,0.0001035667,0.00004875413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003628564,0.0001213341,0.792649,0.00009542095,0.000394003,0.0003557864,0.0003637568,0.1427089,0.03530465,0.003012141,0.0003614599,0.02427073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020262,0.0002682464,0.7612746,0.00001550923,0.0001327831,0.0001561976,0.0003247914,0.2314022,0.002662869,0.003307518,0.0004022332,0.00003273277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991166,0.00002674849,0.0006708579,0.00001913314,7.183398e-7,0.000001744565,0.00003249142,0.000005445398,0.0001262323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996321,0.00001816826,0.0002547688,0.000004517623,0.000001081397,0.000002272949,0.0000482323,9.166569e-7,0.00003790131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008017726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0159421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004238126819364043,"score_gpt":0.2111847652288949,"score_spread":0.2069466384095309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}