{"id":"W2293616921","doi":"10.2166/wqrjc.2015.048","title":"Bench-scale comparison of conventional and high rate clarification treatment processes for acid mine drainage","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Mine drainage and remediation techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Flocculation; Acid mine drainage; Effluent; Arsenic; Sedimentation; Environmental science; Drainage; Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Pulp and paper industry; Waste management; Environmental engineering; Sediment; Geology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004474035,0.00008055774,0.0001755636,0.00007667171,0.0002022952,0.00006572593,0.0001437749,0.00006196086,0.0001882413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002431642,0.00005051541,0.00004572928,0.0001128496,0.0002910277,0.0002324741,0.00007106039,0.0001406546,0.00001531354],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001585331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005182981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001965674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009658752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983023,0.0004203579,0.0003817038,0.0001728414,0.0004686776,0.0002540871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992492,0.0001061002,0.0001136441,0.000119084,0.0002345706,0.000177399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006752772,0.001478511,0.05989207,0.0002903838,0.00008315438,0.000005069473,0.01530633,0.00006255371,0.8891042,0.001544811,0.01614562,0.01541194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00140359,0.001119385,0.009623846,0.00002091709,0.00001504339,0.00001289493,0.001349142,0.0001992534,0.9307017,0.04115548,0.01427249,0.0001262332],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868193,0.0001795368,0.00766944,0.004122638,0.00004195262,0.0004472935,0.00002653607,0.00001390129,0.0006793645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951533,0.0000517528,0.003287334,0.00001961383,0.00008149412,0.00004931246,0.00006633223,0.000006436967,0.00128439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05026823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2061111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1811233755790409,"score_gpt":0.4336813553848948,"score_spread":0.2525579798058539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}