{"id":"W2294602631","doi":"10.1037/neu0000280","title":"The beneficial influence of inattention on visual interference in schizophrenia.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neuropsychology","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Douglas Mental Health University Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Perception; Audiology; Event-related potential; Visual perception; Interference (communication); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Neuroscience; Psychiatry; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002374824,0.00039118,0.0001086384,0.0003212987,0.0001248492,0.0001623604,0.00009071222,0.0001760866,0.001892929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001206594,0.00008746053,0.00009971908,0.000104711,0.0002387941,0.0001419082,0.0002550847,0.0001558667,0.0001124051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001549674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001259015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001188565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001491933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999275,0.0000136399,0.0000108385,0.00001484455,0.00001853603,0.00001452783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994907,0.0001522899,0.0002293016,0.00002402252,0.00004111978,0.00006251479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004342838,0.00028823,0.4547492,0.0004489931,0.0001635981,0.003757619,0.0006274987,0.0003973235,0.4725143,0.0001694571,0.0002264722,0.06231458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001597882,0.0004335858,0.9938889,0.00000677842,0.00002977418,0.001275496,0.00006983776,0.000154544,0.003912171,0.0001280485,0.00008138749,0.000003465319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990782,0.0001861972,0.000255014,0.00002391023,0.000002786416,0.000005206777,0.00006108289,0.000006626146,0.0003810641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995707,0.00007992957,0.0001973764,0.00001418873,0.000003250555,0.000002986689,0.00004631557,0.000002423159,0.00008295254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001892929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006332457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0732919660153635,"score_gpt":0.3794983945300332,"score_spread":0.3062064285146697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}