{"id":"W2296765281","doi":"","title":"The Convertible Arbitrage Strategy Analyzed","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convertible arbitrage; Convertible bond; Arbitrage; Convertible; Market neutral; Equity (law); Business; Bond; Risk arbitrage; Monetary economics; Hedge fund; Financial economics; Financial system; Economics; Finance; Arbitrage pricing theory; Capital asset pricing model","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004205742,0.0003010523,0.0003094542,0.002501994,0.0008269961,0.001871404,0.0005602663,0.0003892324,0.00321712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003000509,0.0001187712,0.0003630949,0.003302807,0.0004828242,0.0007251833,0.0003458607,0.0004723348,0.0002918997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006283128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003472293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6905259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6603934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993677,0.00002276053,0.00002017922,0.00008409669,0.0003106337,0.0001948124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985175,0.0001549096,0.0005808496,0.00008339329,0.0004929271,0.000170439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006206858,0.0002961517,0.8150095,0.0002497706,0.0002792014,0.001825929,0.00181083,0.01080814,0.005898643,0.03824778,0.009445081,0.1155083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003587257,0.00009429699,0.9340806,0.00005092756,0.0001265625,0.0009260228,0.001813088,0.01684438,0.003158759,0.002643355,0.04015973,0.00006630916],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793785,0.001515915,0.0006387378,0.000180701,0.000007942749,0.00005497221,0.00239448,0.00002914325,0.01579963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918808,0.0005589086,0.0002935095,0.00001763881,0.000006341872,0.000007370289,0.002126845,0.000007274482,0.005101199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6905259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6225932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01895600195050718,"score_gpt":0.1664854020834728,"score_spread":0.1475294001329656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}