{"id":"W2297512140","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2010.020","title":"Reproductive Steroid Responses in Fish Exposed to Pulp Mill Condensates: An Investigation of Cause Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bioassay; Fundulus; Context (archaeology); Chemistry; Paper mill; Chromatography; High-performance liquid chromatography; Solid phase extraction; Environmental chemistry; Pulp mill; Extraction (chemistry); Contamination; Chemical toxicity; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Biology; Fishery; Ecology; Environmental engineering; Water pollutants","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005743018,0.0003257711,0.000431168,0.001239438,0.001042942,0.0003403672,0.0002333298,0.0006662406,0.001492763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006078554,0.0001902075,0.0003764152,0.0003903014,0.0008646515,0.0001753054,0.0004119003,0.00028125,0.0001671184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009677749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000528971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006994632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01643154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996396,0.00007926297,0.00002394837,0.00007989081,0.0001211915,0.00005601782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996282,0.00008879876,0.00009420083,0.00003376295,0.0001092071,0.00004583628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001569675,0.001206206,0.794123,0.0002830321,0.0001338803,0.02354561,0.004196117,0.0003002295,0.1599887,0.0002530036,0.0003201228,0.01408037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006674586,0.01490188,0.8550192,0.00003593558,0.0002545383,0.02040772,0.007002672,0.0007510693,0.09764981,0.0001924512,0.003656918,0.00006116375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987971,0.00008291103,0.0002287451,0.00003493137,0.000003975537,0.00007388119,0.00006460806,0.0000067888,0.0007071189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981877,0.0001584864,0.0003974027,0.00004356692,0.000008315996,0.00002451802,0.00006204179,0.000002421365,0.001115548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006994632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01390785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2851897242627365,"score_gpt":0.4665064584582576,"score_spread":0.1813167341955211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}