{"id":"W2297695298","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.005","title":"Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment: Principles, approaches and research directions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Sustainability; Process (computing); Corporate governance; Process management; Environmental planning; Management science; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Strategic thinking; Strategic planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002330974,0.0008351112,0.0008660977,0.0001230506,0.001026257,0.0001719899,0.0006455041,0.0002380142,0.02035363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002938864,0.0005796357,0.0003737005,0.0004129703,0.002087118,0.001411167,0.001359648,0.0007620904,0.001055415],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004271197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000720298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001344223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001774072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930576,0.001185843,0.0009800616,0.001394928,0.001901617,0.001479948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973588,0.0003762594,0.0004003759,0.0009560083,0.000002913911,0.0009056713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002426261,0.001966891,0.8348415,0.0001997325,0.0003230086,0.00006001154,0.0003792517,0.00002589222,0.05653273,0.001461875,0.001900113,0.1022847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001626951,0.0008183828,0.9482336,0.000943334,0.0002193074,0.0001364628,0.001103928,0.0001897812,0.0004413223,0.001399293,0.04355459,0.001333062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304698,0.01651663,0.0002436638,0.001374223,0.0002241849,0.00275803,0.0003244992,0.0001595657,0.04792948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045296,0.09049764,0.001412626,0.0003709447,0.0001144966,0.0003530765,0.0001301611,0.0001069061,0.002484563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1133921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1525963726103591,"score_gpt":0.4014707730422103,"score_spread":0.2488744004318513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}