{"id":"W2297851153","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005014","title":"Is bias in the eye of the beholder? A vignette study to assess recognition of cognitive biases in clinical case workups","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Quality & Safety","topic":"Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills","field":"Medicine","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Cognitive bias; Vignette; Hindsight bias; Cognition; Confirmation bias; Identification (biology); Medicine; Outcome (game theory); Reporting bias; MEDLINE; Clinical psychology; Psychology; Psychiatry; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03752812,0.0003619605,0.0005769361,0.00365855,0.00224825,0.002228354,0.000823815,0.001412416,0.001783769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1750711,0.0005712691,0.0008360588,0.001585669,0.002606506,0.003190848,0.003247275,0.00151525,0.0002401821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00357592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001702727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002488357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003343703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9601316,0.03087175,0.003165525,0.001183834,0.00342265,0.001224656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7843803,0.1601137,0.037673,0.004855885,0.009339531,0.00363776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001755871,0.001571129,0.7174885,0.001343353,0.0002398475,0.003882438,0.242302,0.0004456612,0.001603964,0.001816647,0.001822058,0.02572854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003173086,0.004836699,0.700011,0.002188613,0.0002597267,0.01166711,0.261543,0.002874044,0.003093485,0.002768929,0.0101186,0.0003215315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981679,0.0002407864,0.0005056977,0.0002795165,0.00001206205,0.0002331936,0.00003290164,0.000002421709,0.0005255254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972504,0.0002496832,0.001700454,0.0002912885,0.00002506636,0.0003287834,0.00004477673,0.000002434737,0.0001071524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4710586535600591,"score_gpt":0.5460120951856193,"score_spread":0.07495344162556022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}