{"id":"W2298377568","doi":"","title":"Multiculturalism and Accommodative Liberalism Revisited","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Multiculturalism; Constitutionalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Individualism; Politics; Essentialism; Political science; Classical liberalism; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Scrutiny; Minority rights; Political economy; Law; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Democracy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008768124,0.0004807205,0.0005640136,0.00178056,0.01113597,0.009328886,0.002038702,0.004715,0.003059254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008290147,0.0002952047,0.0009091898,0.002173128,0.05585395,0.008679358,0.0123495,0.01090396,0.0002538408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01034537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006049993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006524758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005198644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886008,0.00664521,0.0002605771,0.0009274099,0.001783185,0.001782787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952595,0.002874861,0.0004762897,0.0004263984,0.0005067505,0.0004563076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002853284,0.000004754092,0.00009108257,0.000008999675,0.00000216827,0.00002727822,0.003512929,0.00006942359,0.00002030897,0.9946986,0.0005363312,0.001025305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001236295,0.00001003016,0.0002739574,0.00008337137,0.000004436538,0.0000564049,0.00350037,0.0002704155,0.0001286425,0.9464846,0.04916417,0.00001124207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1001623,0.01082378,0.02323293,0.2434498,0.001441677,0.00005444514,0.0000325335,0.00006396609,0.6207386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650506,0.001270665,0.001824604,0.0186654,0.0007266601,0.00008121256,0.000009452404,0.00004045813,0.01233095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01113597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07506126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03302599064785353,"score_gpt":0.3011299673044584,"score_spread":0.2681039766566048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}