{"id":"W2298377568","doi":"","title":"Multiculturalism and Accommodative Liberalism Revisited","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Multiculturalism; Constitutionalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Individualism; Politics; Essentialism; Political science; Classical liberalism; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Scrutiny; Minority rights; Political economy; Law; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Democracy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007924662,0.0000806608,0.0001829994,0.0001080895,0.003288736,0.00006570585,0.0001732199,0.000108028,0.00008143336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001628927,0.00008931122,0.00003846434,0.0002287524,0.001100848,0.0003428756,0.0001753048,0.0005059984,0.00001352483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001545694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006629054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003674177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007060413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983355,0.0005871583,0.00008891791,0.000255724,0.0004367683,0.0002959167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989557,0.0002848226,0.00008018345,0.0001060587,0.000367506,0.00020569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003883544,0.0002151932,0.02418103,0.0001559913,0.000273716,0.0001230822,0.8751878,0.00001770939,0.003928969,0.02234458,0.03952956,0.03365402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003777999,0.0001195004,0.02037666,0.00005027649,0.00001263265,0.000002345223,0.1157886,0.00006010211,0.00001399217,0.00004741309,0.8630354,0.000115351],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8235766,0.002977577,0.00001671193,0.003319803,0.0001550544,0.0002646853,0.000003118525,0.00008314697,0.1696033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628916,0.001079548,0.0005826843,0.000008222491,0.000428427,3.833997e-7,0.000002942816,0.00000618048,0.03500002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8235058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03302599064785353,"score_gpt":0.3011299673044584,"score_spread":0.2681039766566048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}