{"id":"W2298980701","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.003","title":"The urban political ecology of ecosystem services: The case of Barcelona","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Ecosystem valuation; Valuation (finance); Politics; Agriculture; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Political science; Geography; Business; Economics; Ecology; Ecosystem health","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005996223,0.0001155488,0.0002551858,0.0000103649,0.0001895571,0.0000148229,0.0005355104,0.0001218533,0.00136342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002820531,0.00004432238,0.00009993968,0.00004822171,0.0001367034,0.00009543538,0.0003372451,0.00006022255,0.000369059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001292331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001472476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003092182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987344,0.0001336694,0.0004872541,0.0002228298,0.00004017773,0.0003816994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981542,0.001125861,0.0002288327,0.0003778508,0.00001055736,0.0001027125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001505523,0.0003718482,0.8568474,0.0001470788,0.0001675783,0.0001185808,0.00041929,0.0006853872,0.0003024935,0.1350131,0.0008997127,0.004877007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002828977,0.00167221,0.8184575,0.00007954078,0.000166227,0.00133565,0.003753734,0.0183315,0.003594019,0.05630273,0.0925879,0.0008899924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990756,0.00001904253,0.000003150403,0.00184393,0.0001987728,0.0002010741,0.00005117484,0.00001189561,0.006914927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994895,0.00005225419,0.00002389833,0.0002839889,0.00006107677,0.00002282817,9.621673e-7,0.000006899238,0.00005857669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09168819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008046022363324327,"score_gpt":0.1951998997958032,"score_spread":0.1871538774324789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}