{"id":"W2299107892","doi":"10.1680/ijpmg.2002.020102","title":"Characterization of failure in sand under triaxial compression using an industrial X-ray CT scanner","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics","topic":"Rock Mechanics and Modeling","field":"Engineering","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scanner; Triaxial shear test; Compression (physics); Geotechnical engineering; Nondestructive testing; Computed tomography; Characterization (materials science); Tomography; X-ray; Materials science; Engineering; Structural engineering; Computer science; Composite material; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Optics; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005565642,0.0003351769,0.0002556871,0.001177466,0.0003402077,0.0003516746,0.000469507,0.0004257498,0.001671774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001455372,0.0002058853,0.000107104,0.0006586629,0.0006091578,0.0003324116,0.0003120804,0.0002695298,0.0002832837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000224663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004260653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002366595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005353202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995643,0.00004450912,0.00003240372,0.00004286242,0.0002742048,0.00004168552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983823,0.0005022405,0.0002484939,0.0001708373,0.0005991035,0.00009690346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002837422,0.00004619957,0.008320813,0.000105746,0.000008665612,0.0003525282,0.0001946813,0.002238553,0.976213,0.0002626706,0.0001199094,0.01185359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002851476,0.001085433,0.09106969,0.00002805648,0.00004394353,0.002474673,0.0002977387,0.02555232,0.877337,0.0001479999,0.00188226,0.00005222794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503692,0.0003143661,0.04627393,0.00004833606,0.00001175748,0.0001161073,0.0003131369,0.0002962488,0.002256925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800801,0.0001839091,0.01860921,0.00001552523,0.000005789173,0.00004811512,0.0002322121,0.00002390952,0.0008012185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002366595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005592585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0557685848908748,"score_gpt":0.2597127312257694,"score_spread":0.2039441463348946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}