{"id":"W2299573647","doi":"10.1080/14774003.2008.11667721","title":"Falling through the Legal Cracks: The Pitfalls of Using Workers Compensation Data as Indicators of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Workers' compensation; Falling (accident); Work (physics); Occupational safety and health; Plaintiff; Occupational injury; Relevance (law); Human factors and ergonomics; Perspective (graphical); Injury prevention; Poison control; Actuarial science; Business; Environmental health; Medicine; Forensic engineering; Demographic economics; Psychology; Engineering; Economics; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002198631,0.000119499,0.0003006063,0.00008461297,0.001689791,0.000008503748,0.0001282542,0.00009302341,0.000006685975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003566822,0.00007188777,0.0000131302,0.0004690508,0.0005467072,0.0005229008,0.0002553769,0.0004701944,5.456101e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002773769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005621267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03578116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005471161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972999,0.001303236,0.0007546193,0.0001881274,0.0001692188,0.0002848926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903777,0.008481367,0.0007477152,0.0002605719,0.00006369298,0.00006900683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001811981,0.0000905511,0.7256774,0.0008677068,0.0001429735,0.00000233561,0.2132894,0.00003723927,0.000003199687,0.03997046,0.0008957245,0.01721108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001913825,0.0002549955,0.6865383,0.001592869,0.000104243,0.00003919374,0.12564,0.00008898314,0.000005476501,0.00480721,0.1787237,0.0002911798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8826759,0.01169676,0.00003394831,0.1014241,0.0001441961,0.0007220462,0.00003586571,0.00001251979,0.003254622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591841,0.03747424,0.0002314132,0.002942125,0.00008779276,0.000008056079,0.00001355172,0.000008782223,0.00004989867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.177828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1297870988375733,"score_gpt":0.4698155173305714,"score_spread":0.3400284184929981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}