{"id":"W2299773574","doi":"10.3390/risks4010008","title":"Optimal Insurance for a Minimal Expected Retention: The Case of an Ambiguity-Seeking Insurer","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Georgia State University","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Deductible; Ambiguity; Constraint (computer-aided design); Indemnity; Actuarial science; Distortion (music); Schedule; Equivalence (formal languages); Insurance policy; Mathematics; Arrow; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00409299,0.0008321909,0.001907495,0.0005979209,0.0006576966,0.001599,0.001441526,0.002806464,0.002615205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01044273,0.0006356793,0.001132862,0.0004904668,0.001977301,0.003032375,0.001565305,0.001865192,0.0002402973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001761849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001673107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001458771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005397003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977987,0.000923536,0.0001152877,0.0004529986,0.0003309943,0.0003783886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954553,0.003009054,0.0006597209,0.0002954382,0.0002223578,0.0003581221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004757492,0.0002629706,0.002000662,0.0003625921,0.0001517564,0.0007061353,0.0005701558,0.308402,0.005868831,0.6548135,0.001923517,0.02446215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002589337,0.0004012249,0.001442097,0.0001168897,0.00007931638,0.0003871591,0.0001676818,0.4991543,0.002069301,0.493606,0.002243419,0.00007371774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3223758,0.001398983,0.6551265,0.005097392,0.0000656779,0.0001729668,0.0002986642,0.0001312621,0.01533277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535351,0.0004800396,0.04265369,0.0001540044,0.0000667265,0.0001089106,0.0000548229,0.0000254702,0.002921187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00409299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02164608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2717739886010315,"score_gpt":0.444976422569051,"score_spread":0.1732024339680194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}