{"id":"W2299773574","doi":"10.3390/risks4010008","title":"Optimal Insurance for a Minimal Expected Retention: The Case of an Ambiguity-Seeking Insurer","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risks","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Georgia State University","keywords":"Expected utility hypothesis; Deductible; Ambiguity; Constraint (computer-aided design); Indemnity; Actuarial science; Distortion (music); Schedule; Equivalence (formal languages); Insurance policy; Mathematics; Arrow; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002329188,0.0001313983,0.0002852498,0.0001333058,0.0002442765,0.0001578525,0.0006683897,0.00008436561,0.0001612547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001875329,0.00006527018,0.0001965905,0.0002993258,0.0001798825,0.0004130599,0.0001124312,0.00008314716,0.00005403582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003028477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000528699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001324595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002117378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980937,0.0001628647,0.0007184558,0.0004615067,0.0003318124,0.0002316635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967897,0.001462779,0.0004307129,0.0008343017,0.0003974409,0.00008507183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002750579,0.0001252965,0.00984634,0.000002039697,0.0000117436,0.0001058844,0.0006118414,0.00008456455,0.002725893,0.0002484279,0.001426849,0.9845361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01177593,0.003547293,0.6989269,0.0005018407,0.0002433216,0.004905343,0.01352796,0.02619457,0.01819529,0.1571096,0.06274009,0.002331892],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912676,0.00005397814,0.007281572,0.0002911459,0.000464846,0.0002210035,0.0001698973,0.0000299997,0.0002199835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950033,0.000004762157,0.004519112,0.00004406018,0.0001288028,0.00002818828,0.000001363587,0.00001391903,0.0002565237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2661641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2717739886010315,"score_gpt":0.444976422569051,"score_spread":0.1732024339680194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}