{"id":"W2300872791","doi":"10.14288/1.0077961","title":"Life Cycle Assessment of Vanier Residence in University of British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Residence; Scope (computer science); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental science; Energy consumption; Primary energy; Engineering; Environmental engineering; Civil engineering; Environmental economics; Operations management; Energy (signal processing); Production (economics); Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003380548,0.00005469374,0.0004202831,0.00007071852,0.00009927872,0.0000678729,0.0004868275,0.0001742733,0.0004658154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004762751,0.000267015,0.000123971,0.0004785425,0.000293543,0.0003741084,0.0001519697,0.0003258979,0.000002241165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003183855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5051731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8371663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987736,0.00005710225,0.0002112929,0.0003171895,0.0003262523,0.0003146016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990229,0.00007739255,0.0001406413,0.0003408367,0.0002320218,0.0001862295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000270391,0.000961122,0.5598349,0.001797862,0.0002861731,0.001905097,0.0007199048,0.008436429,0.01562259,0.00002568471,0.04700245,0.3633808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187732,0.00006332849,0.9877596,0.000323088,0.00003836629,0.00002139414,0.003246207,0.006462515,0.000003240335,0.0002634001,0.0003958084,0.0002352781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953501,0.0000816684,0.00142588,0.0000181446,0.0001758231,0.0002625033,0.0001675732,0.00008123286,0.002437063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953422,0.0002128358,0.003355244,0.00000765592,0.00001444139,2.302442e-7,0.000008866453,0.00002053689,0.001038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4279248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005069226248137765,"score_gpt":0.1801315121388494,"score_spread":0.1750622858907117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}