{"id":"W2301067200","doi":"","title":"Computation of Portfolio VaRs with GARCH-Type Volatility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Blind Source Separation Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Econometrics; Volatility (finance); Value at risk; Portfolio; Multivariate statistics; Independent component analysis; Computation; Financial asset; Nonlinear system; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Financial economics; Finance; Statistics; Algorithm; Risk management; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001431778,0.0006879091,0.0008067641,0.001474548,0.0003210299,0.001327561,0.0006604223,0.0008067257,0.001683787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009810229,0.0006457259,0.0007564945,0.001040762,0.0004302569,0.001323572,0.0006415851,0.001135093,0.0003755367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004807026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009647227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002132984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002082076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995945,0.0001312056,0.00003208672,0.00006497688,0.0001371857,0.00004008558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973778,0.002039625,0.0001786845,0.0001472196,0.0001904826,0.00006626255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000565894,0.00004116504,0.002548839,0.00006941643,0.00009929042,0.0001239996,0.00005357614,0.8709863,0.002896814,0.04034897,0.0008893722,0.08188569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003761679,0.000009273496,0.0003380788,0.00000395119,0.000004326352,0.00002186505,0.000006132734,0.9849457,0.0005303983,0.01391315,0.0002172787,0.000006138919],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02090252,0.000133522,0.977716,0.0000913268,0.00001795865,0.00001497695,0.00006018743,0.0004117052,0.000651805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5211126,0.0005092422,0.4753787,0.0000839237,0.0001183363,0.00009829703,0.0006144777,0.0002391361,0.001845418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002132984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007572055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007616515142120051,"score_gpt":0.241005569202694,"score_spread":0.2333890540605739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}