{"id":"W2301136249","doi":"10.18192/olbiwp.v3i0.1096","title":"A Foucauldian approach to language policy: The case of Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OLBI Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Language policy; Premise; Field (mathematics); Biculturalism; Language planning; Order (exchange); Sociology; Power (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Set (abstract data type); Commission; Work (physics); Political science; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Economics; Pedagogy; Engineering; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000502208,0.00004102403,0.00007964588,0.00001741517,0.0003299777,0.00002406224,0.0002073111,0.00002381767,0.00008017851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003072604,0.00002547732,0.00003395271,0.0001451118,0.00006532395,0.00004508623,0.000018496,0.0001085481,0.000002892542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001548201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001093324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9478219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99923,0.0001076347,0.0001261847,0.00005190347,0.0001951951,0.0002890572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994733,0.00003498772,0.00007351577,0.0000908997,0.00004328213,0.0002840256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008435722,0.0000489062,0.001045868,0.000008808521,0.00002698965,0.0007692874,0.09831051,0.000002645335,0.00003213834,0.8572306,0.03695545,0.005560383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004963987,0.00009894021,0.03372147,0.0000826578,0.00003121464,0.004430536,0.09743565,0.00003339889,0.000323426,0.009480912,0.8534668,0.0003986218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3998186,0.0001228063,0.0001531922,0.0035034,0.0002423022,0.00009528311,0.00001882135,0.000004416525,0.5960412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945663,0.000003259667,0.0001875023,0.0006337956,0.0006220368,0.000001903984,4.003332e-8,0.00000340651,0.003981788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8477497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2537955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03009113192473656,"score_gpt":0.2865584654726203,"score_spread":0.2564673335478837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}