{"id":"W2304556698","doi":"","title":"Systematic Reviews and Economic Evaluations in Tecchnology Appraisals Conducted for Nice in the UK: A Game of Two Halves?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nice; Economic evaluation; Systematic review; Excellence; Cost effectiveness; Health technology; Quality-adjusted life year; Pooling; Medicine; Actuarial science; MEDLINE; Economics; Computer science; Health care; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.760882,0.006040424,0.0168664,0.02666619,0.005463553,0.03861693,0.01219464,0.04749835,0.0189584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9030231,0.008877222,0.008394619,0.02862762,0.05395367,0.05792144,0.02632284,0.03059669,0.006044737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03890811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05990451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008191028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01005142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.07245725,0.8295842,0.0540802,0.01014188,0.03100439,0.002732079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04925026,0.8452412,0.05021356,0.01740571,0.03305309,0.004836096],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003764668,0.0002562963,0.002253981,0.1585746,0.005079053,0.0008853583,0.007402379,0.00372355,0.0002894711,0.4930881,0.1718313,0.1528513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005328136,0.0005841909,0.001491406,0.3488532,0.002903052,0.001118371,0.002843048,0.008804007,0.000280629,0.4997146,0.1272277,0.0008516119],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001384925,0.1749948,0.06069253,0.7200701,0.01642101,0.01029094,0.0007364854,0.0003144467,0.01509487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1364256,0.08907605,0.3420129,0.3314017,0.02973758,0.06700201,0.0006700749,0.0005476364,0.003126467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.239118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2948751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2479009964463348,"score_gpt":0.4829278531598561,"score_spread":0.2350268567135213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}