{"id":"W2304609871","doi":"10.7717/peerj.1832","title":"Comparative analysis of different survey methods for monitoring fish assemblages in coastal habitats","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Seagrass; Species richness; Geography; Zostera marina; Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem; Foundation species; Threatened species; Seascape; Range (aeronautics); Fishery; Netting; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005363216,0.00008837313,0.0003957083,0.0001603327,0.00002424526,0.00000955404,0.0001169185,0.00004124016,0.0002027071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001282064,0.0000524417,0.00007912678,0.00024738,0.00003780773,0.00005951978,0.00001708016,0.0000362726,0.000002871486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002158249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000115664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01099961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2147359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991218,0.0002521775,0.0002002078,0.0001725804,0.00007305892,0.0001801905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975798,0.002157075,0.00007410906,0.00009317283,0.00005028946,0.00004558052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007989162,0.00001410277,0.9149143,0.000005166748,0.0001164707,5.662273e-7,0.00006353174,0.0000554189,0.00145942,0.000008460781,0.00006975584,0.08321293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001896694,0.0001018169,0.9934711,0.000006873127,0.00004967036,3.186453e-7,0.00005811889,0.001895823,0.003722718,0.0001247963,0.0003000983,0.00007898686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938934,0.0000373401,0.003484927,0.00007688186,0.0001540305,0.00009099659,0.0007682071,0.000008000073,0.001486233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978909,0.00002243861,0.001029278,0.0000104765,0.00002319751,0.000002250546,0.0003191917,9.058318e-7,0.0007012967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2037363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07718402990701839,"score_gpt":0.3510915025719938,"score_spread":0.2739074726649754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}