{"id":"W2304743800","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.06.2.p052","title":"Quantitative Methodology Research: Is it on Psychologists’ Reading Lists?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Computer science; Quantitative research; Data science; Reading (process); Management science; Section (typography); Sociology; Social science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3191279,0.001080257,0.00451614,0.03044452,0.0092344,0.0252883,0.006536162,0.006212107,0.01743809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7960335,0.002962002,0.002202975,0.05481932,0.02270032,0.04809093,0.01257395,0.006316747,0.005730312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0120355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0192232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00776386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009304811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4447791,0.3602193,0.05416062,0.02775712,0.107506,0.005577825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.120825,0.6512303,0.07828919,0.06203467,0.08384867,0.00377226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000441903,0.0003334336,0.05370516,0.01342388,0.001016531,0.0004168214,0.1171085,0.0004978859,0.002482065,0.08567298,0.05081139,0.6740895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005709777,0.001273931,0.1139246,0.06007712,0.001356757,0.001522585,0.1323734,0.006275513,0.009285719,0.2540926,0.4181403,0.00110648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1223944,0.06785215,0.3882501,0.261805,0.01731873,0.004666179,0.003530572,0.002258427,0.1319246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6575425,0.03059237,0.1940322,0.0787417,0.01045541,0.01092628,0.00247838,0.001429707,0.0138015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8396366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9852721224955784,"score_gpt":0.813547224278978,"score_spread":0.1717248982166004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}