{"id":"W2304743800","doi":"10.20982/tqmp.06.2.p052","title":"Quantitative Methodology Research: Is it on Psychologists’ Reading Lists?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Computer science; Quantitative research; Data science; Reading (process); Management science; Section (typography); Sociology; Social science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6656507,0.0007643042,0.007071316,0.00340663,0.0004588589,0.0005397227,0.00447984,0.0008890883,0.009379771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6263745,0.0004603515,0.002030357,0.004735176,0.001453727,0.0003392028,0.0002465534,0.002071033,0.004125494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000873597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001451846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006324353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001534342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.69666,0.2716166,0.01870583,0.006039572,0.004915246,0.002062673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5930027,0.3849293,0.007265254,0.008609369,0.005773511,0.0004198987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000889078,0.0002978462,0.0007435029,0.00003394656,0.0002713417,0.00001344219,0.006310925,0.000008848833,0.05094884,0.7479792,0.1562142,0.03628883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008819605,0.001551332,0.001951985,0.00003429451,0.00006326075,0.00001982365,0.00276822,0.0006528403,0.001272125,0.5514946,0.4389413,0.0003683036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03790173,0.0004925908,0.8764539,0.01474654,0.02074469,0.003149941,0.0001049929,0.00002487668,0.04638072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008723484,0.00007595636,0.9813031,0.003136517,0.0006351161,0.0007909429,0.00001389673,0.00006814404,0.005252833],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.282727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9852721224955784,"score_gpt":0.813547224278978,"score_spread":0.1717248982166004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}