{"id":"W2305457712","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.02.001","title":"A choice-semantical approach to theoretical truth","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Coherence theory of truth; Semantic theory of truth; Truth value; Computer science; Epistemology; Truth table; Pragmatic theory of truth; Logical truth; Semantics (computer science); Modal; Truth condition; Logical connective; Modal logic; Philosophy; Algorithm; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01381095,0.0008309112,0.001510702,0.005515726,0.005048295,0.009021409,0.004189775,0.004610454,0.01443187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0213449,0.001100408,0.002614311,0.004286716,0.03839771,0.02728903,0.005099734,0.007501523,0.001340384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007267052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003374174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003939948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002768353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896186,0.006725008,0.0006083341,0.0009455675,0.001618831,0.0004835925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776261,0.01692926,0.00071695,0.00218484,0.001908786,0.0006340024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003352292,0.000002978652,0.0000146073,0.000008177926,0.000001902345,0.000004809962,0.0001727995,0.00007982541,0.00001137975,0.9990652,0.0002104791,0.0004245099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005381765,0.000001777945,0.00001241814,0.000005810076,0.000002291477,0.000006733279,0.00006182355,0.0003460595,0.00002260526,0.9978517,0.001681125,0.000002306286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01788445,0.003459084,0.6126537,0.05393259,0.000875921,0.0001535991,0.0005973653,0.0002710214,0.3101723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8707451,0.001333609,0.1061342,0.00311811,0.001236601,0.0003588269,0.0004178685,0.0002513061,0.01640452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07304013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1452572592103524,"score_gpt":0.2915826309891869,"score_spread":0.1463253717788345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}