{"id":"W2306093917","doi":"10.12943/cnr.2015.00048","title":"A WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE APPROACH TO THE ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL RISK FROM HISTORICAL CONTAMINATION OF OTTAWA RIVER SEDIMENTS NEAR CHALK RIVER LABORATORIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AECL Nuclear Review","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nuclear Laboratories","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Benthic zone; Environmental science; Invertebrate; Trophic level; Sediment; Biota; Bioaccumulation; Mercury (programming language); Contamination; Ecology; Benthos; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001025009,0.0001472828,0.0004875129,0.00001649899,0.00009373655,0.000003929043,0.0004367023,0.000129042,0.001264315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000296996,0.00009376631,0.00008927973,0.0002947596,0.0006090989,0.0001646282,0.0003723993,0.0001876016,0.0002084433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004807155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000211713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002681971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002359556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980848,0.0005362238,0.0004933354,0.0003164416,0.0003894715,0.000179679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988523,0.0001839302,0.0004474956,0.0003777519,0.00002183931,0.0001166723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001167984,0.004039286,0.8206604,0.0005991446,0.0002600031,0.00001308148,0.004276179,0.0007639218,0.004135408,0.003385205,0.1354893,0.0262613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004715808,0.0009527603,0.6448796,0.0002418426,0.0002231526,0.000003556057,0.00007897183,0.0004576218,0.0004221073,0.0003088235,0.3517558,0.0002041558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785598,0.008978431,0.0003141955,0.001837005,0.0004776627,0.001590852,0.00005759655,0.00002468119,0.008159778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771982,0.006677519,0.0149022,0.0009480814,0.00002897153,0.00004569968,0.000007402543,0.00001582613,0.0001760611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2162665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05551699721640262,"score_gpt":0.2869172608942187,"score_spread":0.231400263677816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}