{"id":"W2308473015","doi":"10.1007/s00285-016-0989-1","title":"Modelling the fear effect in predator–prey interactions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Biology","topic":"Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models","field":"Medicine","cited_by":710,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Predator; Hopf bifurcation; Biology; Ecology; Bifurcation; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03665925551575534,"score_gpt":0.3337088063239614,"score_spread":0.2970495508082061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."},"direct_labels":[],"classifier":{"requested":true,"available":true,"version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","frame_rows_covered":4299418,"decision_targets":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","randomized_trial","nonrandomized_trial","observational","systematic_review","meta_analysis","case_report","qualitative","simulation_or_modeling","bench_or_experimental","theoretical_or_conceptual","not_applicable"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame.","warning":null},"prediction":{"classifier_version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","candidate_union":["simulation_or_modeling","theoretical_or_conceptual"],"consensus_intersection":["simulation_or_modeling","theoretical_or_conceptual"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"scores":{"codex":{"metaresearch":0.005127031357289998,"metaepi_narrow":0.00039673456931410697,"metaepi_broad":0.0006103608758678569,"bibliometrics":0.0001373311970702678,"sts":0.000015259021896696422,"scholarly_communication":0.0005188067444876783,"open_science":0.000045777065690089265,"research_integrity":0.012939650568398567,"randomized_trial":0.00012207217517357137,"nonrandomized_trial":0.000030518043793392844,"observational":0.008392462043183032,"systematic_review":0.00019836728465705348,"meta_analysis":0.00010681315327687495,"case_report":0.00009155413138017853,"qualitative":0.000015259021896696422,"simulation_or_modeling":0.08014038300144961,"bench_or_experimental":0.0006561379415579462,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.7579613946746013,"not_applicable":0.001373311970702678,"design_other":0.0002746623941405356},"gemma":{"metaresearch":0.014801251239795529,"metaepi_narrow":0.00019836728465705348,"metaepi_broad":0.00030518043793392844,"bibliometrics":0.000015259021896696422,"sts":0.00009155413138017853,"scholarly_communication":0.00009155413138017853,"open_science":0.000045777065690089265,"research_integrity":0.0017547875181200886,"randomized_trial":0.000045777065690089265,"nonrandomized_trial":0.0002136263065537499,"observational":0.00247196154726482,"systematic_review":0.0008545052262149996,"meta_analysis":0.00016784924086366064,"case_report":0.00016784924086366064,"qualitative":0.000015259021896696422,"simulation_or_modeling":0.6012207217517357,"bench_or_experimental":0.00024414435034714275,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.41202410925459676,"not_applicable":0.000503547722590982}},"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame."}}