{"id":"W2308504655","doi":"","title":"Improvising Innovation: A Case Study in the University of Guelph Library","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Organizational Learning and Leadership","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Creativity; Quality (philosophy); Management; Library science; Public relations; Sociology; Medical education; Psychology; Political science; Visual arts; Art; Computer science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005525248,0.00008146874,0.0001215792,0.0002502381,0.0003846241,0.00003705288,0.0005370617,0.00005269,0.0003732691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006170401,0.00007141203,0.00004242613,0.001715994,0.0001674212,0.0008096531,0.00020488,0.0003023778,0.00004063139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000705254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004496377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003420914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008229891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994102,0.00005030545,0.00009987357,0.0001392672,0.0001844906,0.0001158453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992608,0.0001050842,0.0002228896,0.0002716479,0.0001343163,0.000005251425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005621683,0.001324847,0.8226244,0.0004876175,0.0002070933,0.002327826,0.06063128,0.0004666276,0.03938324,0.05171103,0.01196204,0.008311794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001146008,0.00004000233,0.680478,0.00001886954,0.0001247023,0.00004302363,0.3052894,0.0008758979,0.00001143356,0.0004288998,0.01137989,0.0001638844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913853,0.00001034558,0.00009869549,0.004879735,0.00008474318,0.0002011529,0.000001954511,0.00003816715,0.003299836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990445,0.000001115774,0.0001179491,0.0001779808,0.0001713966,2.049331e-8,0.00001075546,0.000008558077,0.0004676921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2446581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5171422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02271624704879859,"score_gpt":0.2034684384821356,"score_spread":0.180752191433337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}