{"id":"W2309351159","doi":"10.5558/tfc2016-010","title":"Marmot Creek Experimental Watershed Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Marmot; Hydrograph; Streamflow; Watershed; Clearing; Climate change; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Snowmelt; Snow; Precipitation; Structural basin; Drainage basin; Physical geography; Geography; Ecology; Geology; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002226896,0.0001109054,0.00009312085,0.000008053776,0.0003215467,0.00001798807,0.000356071,0.00002526321,0.004385404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006332014,0.00005605023,0.00003857501,0.00006078531,0.0003764927,0.0001510501,0.0005670242,0.00005299271,0.001980063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001180856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002546426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004114132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000259924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990653,0.00006888127,0.0001216129,0.0002443236,0.0001684628,0.0003314109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995406,0.00003166933,0.00003187338,0.0003531081,0.000001362664,0.00004134949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001383122,0.0007997307,0.9292061,0.000003434569,0.0001381449,0.00005284318,0.003332247,0.0002239849,0.01863482,0.000159822,0.04386185,0.003448697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004344612,0.001432196,0.9354576,0.00001156672,0.00007288928,0.00001336769,0.002644423,0.000190526,0.02505635,0.002981868,0.02729159,0.0005029771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909185,0.00003527766,0.00005116594,0.001627246,0.00009561046,0.0003219843,0.000001388615,0.00006437162,0.006884454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994806,0.000005396251,0.00001841776,0.0002507715,0.00004442533,0.00005941377,6.268879e-7,0.00001068914,0.004804259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01657026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01459596019196173,"score_gpt":0.2401232858704391,"score_spread":0.2255273256784774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}