{"id":"W2310008377","doi":"10.1177/1468794115626244","title":"Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: a case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Psychology; Investment (military); Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Peer group; Public relations; Social psychology; Process (computing); Applied psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06517741,0.001525562,0.001245019,0.002138801,0.01813694,0.005724927,0.005426943,0.007052994,0.002714449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0542733,0.001342639,0.001149096,0.002689976,0.01347411,0.006654452,0.0105847,0.006015091,0.0008575276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004223837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006074781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003057551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008102482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9012236,0.08978339,0.001665756,0.001669173,0.002925152,0.00273299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9156118,0.07019274,0.003564439,0.002879218,0.003068173,0.004683712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001583294,0.0005798284,0.002012953,0.0007215861,0.00002078234,0.0171133,0.9497865,0.0004102799,0.002266673,0.006372978,0.001627683,0.01892911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000939339,0.0008395209,0.001146052,0.00142282,0.00004423671,0.01339144,0.9197785,0.001567058,0.002917375,0.004726408,0.05397848,0.00009426558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8648576,0.00394931,0.08097541,0.01782862,0.0005851691,0.007650781,0.0002318742,0.0002326355,0.02368866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220403,0.003364826,0.06138525,0.002736102,0.0001769142,0.004332304,0.00008119131,0.0001266618,0.00575624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3446952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9050232879490918,"score_gpt":0.7786427984073505,"score_spread":0.1263804895417413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}