{"id":"W2310033568","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2002.004","title":"Sublethal Toxicity Findings by the Pulp and Paper Industry for Cycles 1 and 2 of the Environmental Effects Monitoring Program","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Effluent; Toxicity; Paper mill; Pulp (tooth); Toxicology; Environmental science; Pulp mill; Biology; Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009294527,0.0002887264,0.0003133767,0.0008661122,0.0005742156,0.0003663452,0.0004046242,0.0004754562,0.001088198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008689211,0.0001537247,0.0003787731,0.0005229802,0.000269209,0.000191221,0.0003903522,0.0003207227,0.0001662912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001405594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008518026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02514907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07938444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988978,0.0001607756,0.00005669368,0.0001515981,0.0006212517,0.0001118678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989458,0.0001519987,0.0002464055,0.00007338544,0.0005050506,0.00007746997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001463831,0.0007024973,0.4960423,0.0001223615,0.0001081682,0.0005888561,0.0007613372,0.00144187,0.4625154,0.0001102924,0.0005970053,0.03554618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003221889,0.005706387,0.8021835,0.00000792293,0.00009865123,0.0002171376,0.0003695497,0.001126013,0.1875396,0.00005183124,0.002642602,0.00002460574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976916,0.00007736401,0.00045442,0.00001715259,0.000002779666,0.00007988644,0.000341755,0.0000144958,0.001320665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933714,0.00009145623,0.00135329,0.00005707155,0.000002611831,0.0000721889,0.0009475529,0.000006059672,0.004098395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.974851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05000538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06964335938681455,"score_gpt":0.3543243462049655,"score_spread":0.284680986818151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}