{"id":"W2310033568","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2002.004","title":"Sublethal Toxicity Findings by the Pulp and Paper Industry for Cycles 1 and 2 of the Environmental Effects Monitoring Program","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Effluent; Toxicity; Paper mill; Pulp (tooth); Toxicology; Environmental science; Pulp mill; Biology; Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002763435,0.0001302313,0.0001631,0.0000241592,0.00117554,0.00008277351,0.0003443402,0.0002490806,0.000820284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001020056,0.00006752434,0.00007154043,0.00006590617,0.001954156,0.0002402877,0.0005824277,0.001164444,0.00001511688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001420296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002439198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002671756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001185548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976262,0.0008013415,0.0002732168,0.0002533895,0.0004615288,0.0005843104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991691,0.0004172756,0.00006110688,0.0001888644,0.000003028862,0.0001606019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004134499,0.0002752621,0.4941557,0.00002108067,0.00003059507,0.000002724343,0.001071515,0.000005868301,0.4919235,0.000007337989,0.001856265,0.01060882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008312286,0.0005415239,0.5231147,0.00002004659,0.00001676154,0.0001508995,0.0005894098,0.00005285914,0.4679202,0.001097049,0.005521266,0.0001440724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962808,0.0002361069,0.000003081382,0.002513362,0.00008683434,0.0006435026,0.00001308977,0.000005202749,0.0002180383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980779,0.0001898018,0.0001224455,0.0001250297,0.0000689262,0.00008486925,9.190847e-7,0.00001132034,0.001318741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02895896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9041421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06964335938681455,"score_gpt":0.3543243462049655,"score_spread":0.284680986818151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}