{"id":"W2311709439","doi":"10.2166/wst.2015.609","title":"Evaluation of the applicability of the SWAT model in an arid piedmont plain oasis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Science & Technology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Hydrology (agriculture); Watershed; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Alluvial plain; SWAT model; Environmental science; Arid; Coastal plain; Water balance; Ridge; Geology; Streamflow; Geography; Drainage basin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001340974,0.0008310169,0.0004946025,0.0005355472,0.0007743388,0.001351002,0.00100446,0.0009285065,0.0007415105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002400218,0.0002525898,0.0006406417,0.0007124436,0.000486982,0.0008082056,0.0005261966,0.0004374528,0.0001496304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001775887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001510475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1850682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09244313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996159,0.0001193436,0.00003388783,0.00008337029,0.00006893175,0.00007868779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991879,0.0003515132,0.00006521711,0.00006015294,0.0002634654,0.0000717291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002318278,0.0003294339,0.04810448,0.00005155688,0.00009291635,0.0003110404,0.000117239,0.9367316,0.003414513,0.0005203714,0.0003342863,0.009760682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003869447,0.0001000955,0.01062317,0.000007403183,0.00002242495,0.00001491662,0.0001636192,0.987822,0.0008840412,0.00007901413,0.0002310053,0.00001351227],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996677,0.00002939991,0.001415234,0.00006035427,0.00001051244,0.00003566629,0.0001768505,0.0001059662,0.001489109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977368,0.00003386018,0.001661305,0.00001323149,0.000002775251,0.0000191928,0.0002419136,0.00001137339,0.0002794677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1850682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.367982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03449447549898918,"score_gpt":0.2659777937884857,"score_spread":0.2314833182894965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}