{"id":"W2312231057","doi":"10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000888","title":"Evidential Reasoning–Based Condition Assessment Model for Offshore Gas Pipelines","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Qatar National Research Fund","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Pipeline (software); Evidential reasoning approach; Process (computing); Submarine pipeline; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Raw data; Computer science; Construction engineering; Decision support system; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001738878,0.0007843067,0.000559481,0.00113128,0.0005727739,0.001401158,0.001565265,0.001474824,0.00261787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003436954,0.0003924585,0.0009990009,0.0005971057,0.0009159396,0.001621059,0.0009566383,0.001207654,0.0002854888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00163731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001440144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01291797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008047362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992551,0.0002264575,0.00004833758,0.0001870461,0.0002102988,0.00007269686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987005,0.0007615673,0.0001899711,0.00003890789,0.0002660487,0.00004286108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002048437,0.00001891878,0.0004398805,0.00003239681,0.000015722,0.000105189,0.0001047617,0.9802359,0.0007535623,0.01209896,0.000133581,0.006040573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002474656,0.000007762136,0.00005372172,0.000002414881,0.000004627788,0.00000809504,0.000007597186,0.9966454,0.00009189445,0.003070834,0.0001026013,0.000002590167],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02974422,0.0001302978,0.9639524,0.0002841867,0.0000209884,0.00007641615,0.0001479652,0.0001646256,0.005478812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8945397,0.0002262966,0.1013996,0.0000508381,0.00002436256,0.0002204948,0.0001555854,0.00001536378,0.003367932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01291797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02568555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01386375925266205,"score_gpt":0.2535980476535459,"score_spread":0.2397342884008839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}