{"id":"W2312608944","doi":"10.1111/gwat.12411","title":"Application of an Analytical Solution as a Screening Tool for Sea Water Intrusion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ground Water","topic":"Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Aquifer; Saltwater intrusion; Groundwater; Seawater intrusion; Wedge (geometry); Seawater; Environmental science; Intrusion; Aquifer properties; Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Oceanography; Geotechnical engineering; Groundwater recharge; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002910731,0.000102951,0.0001232523,0.0000380024,0.0001108057,0.00003983109,0.0001364497,0.00008122162,0.0008554592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007273679,0.00004668421,0.00005768102,0.00002749388,0.00006301363,0.0003748547,0.00001859278,0.00003663222,0.0002386116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005308583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006310023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007472753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006215079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990478,0.00002519048,0.000201393,0.0002475303,0.0001557494,0.0003223318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996256,0.00002555764,0.0000231611,0.0001990097,0.00005551662,0.00007119914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007436565,0.00007689594,0.2717469,0.0001102819,0.00005484331,0.000004245036,0.0006285868,0.00009120466,0.337869,0.0001121249,0.0002450656,0.3883171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001771575,0.0006030641,0.1750637,0.0000419777,0.00007578321,0.00005478011,0.00009198411,0.03757814,0.7495784,0.01010591,0.02447969,0.0005549733],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458339,0.000005681413,0.05300935,0.0004371215,0.00006365897,0.0001880649,0.00003302598,0.00002612987,0.0004030712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974471,0.000001525901,0.001028851,0.0000817245,0.0001641139,0.000006897571,0.0005745104,0.000004115995,0.0006912019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4117094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9366678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01640670945034233,"score_gpt":0.2275917667629922,"score_spread":0.2111850573126498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}