{"id":"W2312653693","doi":"10.1007/s12471-016-0825-7","title":"Evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for refractory angina pectoris with quantitative analysis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a short communication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Netherlands Heart Journal","topic":"Pain Management and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cardiology; Extracorporeal shockwave therapy; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Refractory (planetary science); Angina; Internal medicine; Extracorporeal; Perfusion; Revascularization; Radiology; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007558049,0.0002769766,0.000312883,0.0004005847,0.00009298733,0.0002364278,0.000150509,0.0002866053,0.00145799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001175165,0.00006833491,0.00018493,0.000167539,0.0002196231,0.0002287159,0.0001249492,0.0001906169,0.0001647684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001185291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007876236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009432004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001302786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997308,0.0001173284,0.00002670461,0.00002933554,0.00007920022,0.00001662144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993821,0.0002306691,0.000179094,0.00003807208,0.00009522193,0.00007479744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01127601,0.001630336,0.3689892,0.00105256,0.0004879645,0.002121141,0.0004373808,0.001132793,0.4333774,0.00021373,0.0007780357,0.1785035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000441267,0.01639691,0.9347234,0.00004671822,0.0002581836,0.005204491,0.0002179764,0.004311936,0.03720071,0.000173196,0.0009905772,0.00003463271],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954537,0.001414403,0.001980896,0.0000569674,0.00001443857,0.00005722168,0.00006786449,0.00002848358,0.0009259302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976084,0.0003095701,0.001587758,0.00004243892,0.00003611589,0.000049283,0.00007401854,0.000004313176,0.0002880479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00145799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004877448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08748289183260281,"score_gpt":0.3653433142655345,"score_spread":0.2778604224329316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}