{"id":"W2312653693","doi":"10.1007/s12471-016-0825-7","title":"Evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for refractory angina pectoris with quantitative analysis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a short communication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Netherlands Heart Journal","topic":"Pain Management and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cardiology; Extracorporeal shockwave therapy; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Refractory (planetary science); Angina; Internal medicine; Extracorporeal; Perfusion; Revascularization; Radiology; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002406816,0.000137552,0.0003560164,0.0002630981,0.000126155,0.00002008458,0.0000567315,0.00003801104,0.00007648133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005393565,0.00008045631,0.0002159526,0.000291014,0.00007685846,0.0001319024,0.000008821392,0.00009736363,6.772318e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002017814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001733877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003538593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002175743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983253,0.0003737354,0.0002870474,0.0001721546,0.0006534475,0.0001882732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984622,0.0002216549,0.0001616487,0.0003214093,0.0007574584,0.00007565509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00132312,0.0003108704,0.8109872,0.000009933095,0.001143142,0.000007193079,0.0007933408,0.00005230547,0.008006366,0.00004171666,0.0004225286,0.1769023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005236597,0.001622489,0.9656419,0.0002345783,0.004360741,0.00003660859,0.0003724248,0.01750635,0.0005829029,0.0004032306,0.00384391,0.0001582524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743465,0.01726016,0.006567992,0.0005695562,0.0000501854,0.000699573,0.00001573822,0.00001428182,0.000476074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872609,0.001101249,0.01132213,0.00002983262,0.00009556468,0.00003425641,0.00001748736,0.00002048055,0.0001181229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1767441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3280913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08748289183260281,"score_gpt":0.3653433142655345,"score_spread":0.2778604224329316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}