{"id":"W2312714779","doi":"10.1371/currents.dis.11381147bd5e89e38e78434a732f17db","title":"The EnRiCH Community Resilience Framework for High-Risk Populations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Currents","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Community resilience; Asset (computer security); Promotion (chess); Knowledge management; Resilience (materials science); Empowerment; Process management; Environmental resource management; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Economic growth; Computer security; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009382077,0.00123008,0.0005694692,0.00573378,0.006213508,0.005389744,0.002990744,0.002393328,0.006682361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007209996,0.0002825985,0.001110476,0.003273001,0.01791182,0.006132469,0.01095952,0.002838127,0.0005927766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01216137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02172362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03865075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04990579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936138,0.004350544,0.0002037853,0.0004652166,0.000715043,0.0006517238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955227,0.001668199,0.0004610771,0.0002604972,0.0009744429,0.001113102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001270183,0.00004189895,0.003541212,0.000474503,0.00002374109,0.0004091012,0.02220787,0.002080482,0.0001351166,0.9329928,0.009232122,0.02884847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001988442,0.00005874513,0.004886971,0.001762768,0.00004235707,0.0007367285,0.04439927,0.00382078,0.0001335079,0.7482306,0.1958322,0.00007607973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0746721,0.01776385,0.3899502,0.1731314,0.001253834,0.002789253,0.001896749,0.0007884875,0.3377541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8609846,0.005916709,0.119565,0.003178769,0.0002059505,0.001896523,0.000585933,0.00007292898,0.007593604],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03865075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08823735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06428532738032253,"score_gpt":0.3567638072656508,"score_spread":0.2924784798853283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}