{"id":"W2313550107","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1163","title":"American Citations and the McLachlin Court: An Empirical Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Categorization; Law; Political science; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007056328,0.0001583305,0.0004971022,0.0128105,0.00679647,0.005632807,0.001041289,0.001412051,0.004053195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05570558,0.0001787,0.0001674015,0.03572902,0.005579235,0.004750089,0.002685003,0.00240408,0.0004552287],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008127926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007615813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1063129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2150567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913378,0.002976481,0.0004261875,0.0006209927,0.003785191,0.0008533692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9086038,0.04603989,0.02099735,0.001696817,0.01822552,0.004436601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002561006,0.0008803463,0.5206793,0.0004630992,0.00008403011,0.001790064,0.1696159,0.000545452,0.0007284452,0.1567139,0.01728294,0.1309603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006406553,0.0003444309,0.7002806,0.0007697302,0.0001331734,0.001494737,0.1610309,0.001213275,0.0006260378,0.0147196,0.1191802,0.0001433168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509113,0.003541007,0.0002389089,0.002915584,0.00004593817,0.00004151415,0.000137031,0.00001227085,0.04215649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953722,0.001823112,0.0001729266,0.0003348292,0.00008594656,0.00001630432,0.00006832088,0.000007627776,0.002118767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2113882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04015214137463527,"score_gpt":0.3702610854581444,"score_spread":0.3301089440835091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}