{"id":"W2313700874","doi":"10.2514/6.2013-1467","title":"Two-Level Domain Decomposition Method for Uncertainty Quantification","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Computer science; Decomposition; Domain (mathematical analysis); Domain decomposition methods; Mathematics; Physics; Chemistry; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001082012,0.0007260854,0.0009036047,0.0008242209,0.0003630428,0.001149823,0.0008061432,0.0008772998,0.00388275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002155711,0.0004358929,0.001035176,0.0007198509,0.0004607794,0.001142435,0.001256429,0.001635714,0.001110503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004055348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00100212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001725368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001416809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994565,0.0001710125,0.00002994148,0.00007704294,0.0002234948,0.00004200232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992129,0.0003904027,0.00004425243,0.00008962063,0.0002285219,0.00003427098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001396038,0.00008551659,0.000371577,0.0003822473,0.00011443,0.00008840545,0.00008137918,0.4827235,0.0201687,0.08862743,0.005889983,0.4013273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003794443,0.00001002588,0.00005285608,0.000008000374,0.000006284532,0.00001757448,0.000003851037,0.9905112,0.001230712,0.006716171,0.001433073,0.000006352842],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000359761,0.00004626135,0.9992244,0.00001410161,0.000007268017,0.000005271608,0.00002000229,0.00006413247,0.0002588413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07154589,0.00027975,0.9247613,0.00007844178,0.00003749837,0.000131958,0.0003411296,0.0001774095,0.002646549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00388275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01298904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06990014270604977,"score_gpt":0.3629099515374286,"score_spread":0.2930098088313788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}