{"id":"W2313765567","doi":"10.1103/physreve.85.046311","title":"Ring stains in the presence of electrokinetic interactions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review E","topic":"Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Coffee ring effect; Electrokinetic phenomena; Drop (telecommunication); Materials science; Chemical physics; Evaporation; Deposition (geology); Pressure drop; Voltage drop; Mechanics; Substrate (aquarium); Molecular physics; Nanotechnology; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Current (fluid); Thermodynamics; Physics; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000203324,0.0001778567,0.0002661037,0.00016239,0.0003116507,0.0007182149,0.0002618493,0.0002859961,0.00130788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004779343,0.0001402856,0.0001265987,0.00008481492,0.0006422661,0.0004786761,0.0005414604,0.0002581698,0.0002028912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001999292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001235401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001681034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001738131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998091,0.00002138964,0.000007231328,0.00003681243,0.00007939186,0.00004613919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996327,0.0001476685,0.0001078213,0.00003485214,0.00003501983,0.00004186846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001699109,0.00003099685,0.0009709379,0.00009052773,0.00001642121,0.001499621,0.0002062876,0.002516874,0.984216,0.005166677,0.0001687874,0.00494698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003708439,0.0002617049,0.004683411,0.000009278589,0.00002450495,0.001157509,0.0001454838,0.0232345,0.965438,0.001853225,0.00312772,0.00002754456],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981834,0.0007728055,0.01116168,0.00009164099,0.0000390053,0.00002195735,0.0000198416,0.000101916,0.005957149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975051,0.0001811997,0.0012993,0.00002103795,0.000009503361,0.000007624958,0.00001272422,0.00001118581,0.0009522703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00130788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004375279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01965910203339325,"score_gpt":0.2993962660077834,"score_spread":0.2797371639743901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}