{"id":"W2315288918","doi":"10.5558/tfc2014-101","title":"Evaluating a single tree-based growth model for even-aged stands against the maximum size–density relationship: Some insights from balsam fir stands in Quebec, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Université Laval","keywords":"Balsam; Tree (set theory); Statistics; Mathematics; Diameter at breast height; Growth model; Forestry; Geography; Biology; Horticulture; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001867802,0.0006511531,0.0005957499,0.0004724129,0.0008708278,0.0009994835,0.001897697,0.0007838428,0.0009369334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003104035,0.0002558488,0.0005711148,0.0005202727,0.0004797591,0.0005074527,0.0002625438,0.0004687566,0.00009519762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01247075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006572137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.917926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9125763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996926,0.00008441777,0.00001312197,0.00008622227,0.00003982889,0.00008394323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983305,0.0009789625,0.000121424,0.00007056366,0.0003795013,0.0001190791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005725036,0.00007541043,0.04635867,0.00003888151,0.00006351722,0.0001138531,0.000087213,0.9474759,0.0008505702,0.0006839824,0.0003066407,0.003888128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001551177,0.00003001546,0.0143341,0.000007224177,0.00002096836,0.00001405237,0.00009285484,0.9848593,0.0002211295,0.0001784665,0.000210174,0.00001621068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960808,0.0001202266,0.002459146,0.0001039309,0.000004813712,0.00001420208,0.0003343988,0.00005951444,0.0008228963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977137,0.00003754171,0.001638403,0.00002293693,0.000002169295,0.000007347419,0.0002716371,0.00001432159,0.0002919844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08207399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1651146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0213129722643917,"score_gpt":0.2353956033094578,"score_spread":0.2140826310450661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}