{"id":"W2316438342","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2757318","title":"Social Mobility and Stability of Democracy: Re-Evaluating De Tocqueville","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Social mobility; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Limiting; Democracy; Social group; Political economy; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Law; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01149645,0.0004867625,0.001037109,0.003391217,0.003573939,0.003985748,0.001841024,0.001467364,0.009526647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04788073,0.0001313745,0.0007986123,0.004304343,0.006160286,0.005937105,0.004207878,0.001583586,0.0004021513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007012658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005019316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03432418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04805917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963928,0.001771041,0.0001440292,0.0006474984,0.0007118809,0.0003327091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969469,0.01911986,0.002468288,0.003088319,0.004946837,0.0009076358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007801273,0.0001271827,0.06712892,0.0004608885,0.0003222042,0.000343001,0.01265198,0.009494855,0.0002200127,0.6807173,0.008150966,0.2196025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001883533,0.0006699731,0.1207353,0.00118617,0.0006595673,0.0003128451,0.03110457,0.03206145,0.001217803,0.7199636,0.09177264,0.0001276486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6556266,0.009889832,0.02214106,0.03416123,0.0006592299,0.0001898646,0.0006381949,0.00005547401,0.2766385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939908,0.0009410142,0.001369247,0.000319512,0.0001450104,0.00004185429,0.00007467777,0.00001330485,0.003104592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03432418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06824875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04438778863913576,"score_gpt":0.3445931224959883,"score_spread":0.3002053338568526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}