{"id":"W2316465827","doi":"10.7763/ijcte.2013.v5.742","title":"Metrics and Software Quality Evolution: A Case Study on Open Source Software","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Software evolution; Metric (unit); Software quality; Quality (philosophy); Software metric; Software; Open source software; Subject (documents); Quality assurance; Software system; Software engineering; Data mining; Software development; Software construction; World Wide Web; Programming language; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006630197,0.0004238587,0.0004924569,0.00349101,0.001276824,0.001251905,0.001064449,0.001545661,0.0005192989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02760108,0.0002623206,0.0006465596,0.005296737,0.001330533,0.00187356,0.001244894,0.001196625,0.00009023805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001874893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009492591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008306813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01167487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933451,0.003691645,0.00036564,0.0004781199,0.001818231,0.0003011819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9313344,0.05469367,0.005648198,0.002621006,0.004491889,0.001210863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008237765,0.006936371,0.6233359,0.00138684,0.0003612681,0.02080157,0.04738062,0.04921199,0.02054083,0.01557072,0.002568998,0.2110811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002752028,0.004999781,0.7111247,0.0004301828,0.0003646689,0.008823139,0.03251113,0.1883857,0.02709142,0.008719232,0.01701669,0.0002582241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942427,0.0001891288,0.00448898,0.0001549168,0.000004991931,0.00006906201,0.0000718656,0.00002529699,0.0007529738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910241,0.0001570799,0.008220863,0.00002199525,0.00001010951,0.00004419294,0.0001058818,0.00001786399,0.0003978943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008306813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03506428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02653355964376928,"score_gpt":0.3073577864647694,"score_spread":0.2808242268210001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}