{"id":"W2316465827","doi":"10.7763/ijcte.2013.v5.742","title":"Metrics and Software Quality Evolution: A Case Study on Open Source Software","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Software evolution; Metric (unit); Software quality; Quality (philosophy); Software metric; Software; Open source software; Subject (documents); Quality assurance; Software system; Software engineering; Data mining; Software development; Software construction; World Wide Web; Programming language; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001598217,0.0001557121,0.0002224033,0.0004533128,0.00006915614,0.0007301507,0.001116722,0.00004379478,0.000007633525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009122944,0.000137295,0.00004818008,0.0002251495,0.00002352917,0.0009797788,0.0008967868,0.0003226535,0.000004499733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009111205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003686013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004959241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.677313e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986129,0.0001361432,0.0003719127,0.0002200299,0.0004807144,0.0001782509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966592,0.002429395,0.0001201517,0.000225317,0.000394063,0.0001719092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002080063,0.001067912,0.1368204,0.0001437227,0.001784751,0.007789076,0.01108139,0.1211384,0.0002107524,0.04909137,0.0008474999,0.6698167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00883194,0.003518495,0.7159974,0.0008940371,0.00007563583,0.05325714,0.001854895,0.1900394,0.000272719,0.02074936,0.002585396,0.001923627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4377464,0.0001252023,0.5614502,0.00006859568,0.000457492,0.00009954593,7.214934e-7,0.00004989424,0.0000018609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9279128,0.000005703789,0.07172626,0.00007019723,0.0002387331,0.000007753635,2.449471e-7,0.00001392872,0.00002432104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6678931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7040859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02653355964376928,"score_gpt":0.3073577864647694,"score_spread":0.2808242268210001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}