{"id":"W2316496846","doi":"10.1109/iceaa.2014.6903950","title":"A unified implementation of the perfectly matched layer in the finite-element time-domain method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectly matched layer; Stability (learning theory); Finite element method; Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Layer (electronics); Algorithm; Time domain; Mathematics; Materials science; Engineering; Mathematical analysis; Structural engineering; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004947824,0.0004540408,0.0004166905,0.0003364682,0.0003164918,0.0006037753,0.001218925,0.0006977753,0.003058312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007845901,0.0002428322,0.0004458221,0.0003557756,0.0003871126,0.0008889341,0.0006905418,0.0007657358,0.001014685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002951988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006816507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008668673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001080202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996806,0.00007162923,0.00002101121,0.00002498403,0.0001774334,0.00002436483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998319,0.00005159234,0.00001657469,0.00003770881,0.00005151529,0.00001073115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001146424,0.0001015669,0.0005500945,0.0002705364,0.00005287652,0.000313467,0.0001891897,0.3693874,0.0953736,0.3429883,0.003479481,0.1871789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001622667,0.00003759209,0.00007474782,0.00001999542,0.000008828481,0.0001052657,0.00001616116,0.9660661,0.01499825,0.006709418,0.01192914,0.00001829121],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001510787,0.00003933442,0.9961862,0.0000201598,0.00002465108,0.00001793762,0.00001352269,0.0001377093,0.002049593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05428998,0.0001396157,0.9426896,0.0000376198,0.00001527729,0.0001150906,0.00006113068,0.00008861847,0.002563114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003058312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01023108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01426521220834459,"score_gpt":0.3090146151209183,"score_spread":0.2947494029125737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}