{"id":"W2318083464","doi":"10.1109/wartia.2014.6976179","title":"Quantifying risk for determining optimal joint fires in defence planning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2014 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA)","topic":"Military Defense Systems Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ammunition; Collateral; Collateral damage; Joint (building); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Task (project management); Operations research; Engineering; Systems engineering; Business; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005232568,0.001221538,0.0009613722,0.001687198,0.0006434905,0.001762774,0.0007578448,0.001032731,0.001705316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01727832,0.0007940241,0.0008300878,0.0006414977,0.001221335,0.002779682,0.001998233,0.001352909,0.0001760918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001769145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001699326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004793914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004819144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997627,0.001116259,0.0001149192,0.000267514,0.0006924896,0.0001818815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910408,0.007017736,0.001059194,0.0003055523,0.0004115964,0.0001652242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003687116,0.00001230901,0.00119688,0.00003572036,0.00003221058,0.00003379644,0.00005350788,0.9777451,0.0006801208,0.009983313,0.000118285,0.01007188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004256731,0.00004738021,0.0005346601,0.00002456935,0.00001522348,0.00003650399,0.00005724958,0.9789335,0.0008607038,0.01907185,0.0003952007,0.00001901208],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05368521,0.0003996982,0.9424638,0.0002014958,0.00001745853,0.00009407179,0.00007977787,0.00009910447,0.002959498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7836932,0.000316914,0.2146723,0.00003658199,0.00002346577,0.0001394337,0.00008712197,0.00006536333,0.0009656947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005232568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02767283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06920409285081681,"score_gpt":0.3581107064152202,"score_spread":0.2889066135644034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}