{"id":"W2318137547","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2015-0598","title":"Accounting for spatiotemporal variation and fisher targeting when estimating abundance from multispecies fishery data","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean","keywords":"Fishing; Abundance (ecology); Fishery; Stock (firearms); Stock assessment; Spatial variability; Relative species abundance; Spatial ecology; Fish stock; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001427667,0.00007940634,0.0001907722,0.00008388303,0.0003135298,0.0003120786,0.0002270963,0.00003794432,0.0002142795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009467126,0.00006676475,0.00002050775,0.00004000748,0.0002460469,0.001567351,0.00002991391,0.00003701041,0.00000343114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007280693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009107259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008662822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005313084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990882,0.00001042218,0.0004621059,0.0002251954,0.00004387504,0.0001701805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990407,0.0002339941,0.0005072312,0.00009554729,0.00001366807,0.0001089053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002895212,0.000003180242,0.9728373,0.000009118259,0.00001827304,7.089539e-7,0.001706447,0.00001447956,0.00003652912,0.0009747442,0.002645502,0.02175081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007495356,0.0001244563,0.8019794,0.0001471485,0.00001729626,0.000007317072,0.001112426,0.08413977,0.00002047178,0.09097026,0.02044278,0.0002891341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9464235,0.001356041,0.04614472,0.004965415,0.0005411795,0.00009258349,0.0001349311,0.000002721762,0.0003388668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034278,0.00005708999,0.09601619,0.0001756722,0.0002202013,0.00000200051,0.000006851523,0.000006829634,0.00008740169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1708579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1152796195402321,"score_gpt":0.2212081752544898,"score_spread":0.1059285557142577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}