{"id":"W2318138135","doi":"10.1258/ar.2011.110083","title":"Visual and quantitative assessment of lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Radiologica","topic":"Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Intraclass correlation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spinal stenosis; Spinal canal; Repeatability; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Stenosis; Lateral recess; Lumbar; Foramen; Radiology; Reproducibility; Nuclear medicine; Anatomy; Spinal cord","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007326294,0.0003728662,0.0002947955,0.001354314,0.0001862233,0.000565736,0.0003819162,0.000399203,0.0009137783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03444675,0.0001764037,0.000323603,0.0003806866,0.0006053982,0.0006638059,0.0007917658,0.0003189852,0.0002461023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002132406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002212469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005325503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009269512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942211,0.002604984,0.0006565909,0.0006801229,0.001710569,0.0001266275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750336,0.01161477,0.005455944,0.001725194,0.005750863,0.000419563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002073784,0.000284229,0.8801345,0.0005588712,0.000700252,0.0003524135,0.001839668,0.001726337,0.02295634,0.000158904,0.0006748961,0.08853988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008108881,0.001476117,0.9806921,0.00009620593,0.0001880453,0.002869471,0.0005477759,0.004737155,0.008099807,0.0002551202,0.0008837252,0.0000733709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861071,0.000997075,0.01029009,0.00004496962,0.00004323655,0.0001273893,0.0002148499,0.0001128451,0.002062507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994218,0.0001270646,0.005210116,0.000019176,0.00002830795,0.00006514465,0.0001255555,0.00001602823,0.0001905598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007326294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03874558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03847449834624121,"score_gpt":0.3249686010131197,"score_spread":0.2864941026668785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}