{"id":"W2318138135","doi":"10.1258/ar.2011.110083","title":"Visual and quantitative assessment of lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Radiologica","topic":"Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Intraclass correlation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spinal stenosis; Spinal canal; Repeatability; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Stenosis; Lateral recess; Lumbar; Foramen; Radiology; Reproducibility; Nuclear medicine; Anatomy; Spinal cord","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001103902,0.0001232785,0.0003229605,0.00006351365,0.00003301962,0.000004806617,0.00007880568,0.00004390914,0.0002809983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003000772,0.00007920453,0.0000411949,0.00007914576,0.0002633209,0.00006967822,0.00004374809,0.0001304084,0.000001973311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002396944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004512841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003507053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002493439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992012,0.0000629571,0.0001925342,0.0002395716,0.0001036171,0.0002001259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996601,0.000006350329,0.00007740914,0.000122525,0.00006128134,0.00007234231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002234288,0.0001538152,0.9616582,0.00003307623,0.00003215509,0.0002557083,0.0003062165,5.286556e-8,0.03267535,0.0009501226,0.0003005831,0.003411333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009064488,0.009061423,0.9883507,0.0001019626,0.00007186978,0.0002753844,0.0002222893,0.0002806589,0.0005286536,0.00004004461,0.00006159573,0.00009893621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948573,0.001141176,0.00007493416,0.0002333215,0.00003096887,0.0001562465,0.000006758883,0.00001848141,0.003480866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910972,0.0001284124,0.008180783,0.0004539646,0.00001974418,0.00001529348,0.000006077391,0.000008428439,0.00009015176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03214669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3229867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03847449834624121,"score_gpt":0.3249686010131197,"score_spread":0.2864941026668785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}