{"id":"W2318223161","doi":"10.1103/physrevlett.113.104301","title":"Optimal Fractal-Like Hierarchical Honeycombs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review Letters","topic":"Cellular and Composite Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honeycomb; Fractal; Metamaterial; Materials science; Honeycomb structure; Hierarchy; Vertex (graph theory); Hexagonal crystal system; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Base (topology); Topology (electrical circuits); Mathematics; Geometry; Statistical physics; Mathematical analysis; Combinatorics; Physics; Computer science; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005453494,0.0001718027,0.0003035894,0.00002056412,0.00003465122,0.00002244054,0.0001902571,0.00001016619,0.00005416548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001084115,0.0001457107,0.0001896898,0.0001067499,0.00004159784,0.00005735451,0.00003590557,0.0002710914,0.0001968552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001697551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002173222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002136934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.069561e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992274,0.00004323858,0.0001433005,0.0001664498,0.0001796433,0.0002399743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999528,0.00006953589,0.00001649527,0.0002704415,0.000007227179,0.0001083147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002232876,0.0001639409,0.0002181678,0.005411326,0.0002955355,0.00004604307,0.0003678518,0.05548501,0.6200707,0.004862322,0.1839204,0.1291363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005420813,0.00009431772,0.003234938,0.001085744,0.0002094511,0.00003559022,0.000002036237,0.2075878,0.006061596,0.0006229298,0.7793909,0.001132563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663508,0.006558768,0.01985547,0.002905508,0.0004300087,0.0002535434,0.000005296083,0.0003884256,0.003252196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891931,0.0007276355,0.0005922882,0.008975237,0.0004399403,0.000015685,0.00001663874,0.00003133088,0.000008087008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6140091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5941908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00472779826622742,"score_gpt":0.2225551233044929,"score_spread":0.2178273250382655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}