{"id":"W2318282180","doi":"10.1021/je400178k","title":"Molar Heat Capacity (<i>C</i><sub><i>p</i></sub>) of Aqueous Cyclic Amine Solutions from (298.15 to 353.15) K","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Piperazine; Molar; Heat capacity; Morpholine; Chemistry; Mole fraction; Aqueous solution; Amine gas treating; Apparent molar property; Molar concentration; Molar ratio; Partial molar property; Thermodynamics; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003509958,0.0006144459,0.0002399633,0.0005942686,0.0003362039,0.0002452013,0.0007100767,0.0004338062,0.005694713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007337572,0.0002143158,0.000147964,0.0007108207,0.0005250503,0.0004805857,0.0001933778,0.0006652828,0.0009185345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004183582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002267859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001092306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001418334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997444,0.00002474705,0.00001345338,0.00004877794,0.0001067368,0.00006190313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995533,0.0002108685,0.00007555723,0.00002276689,0.0001102508,0.00002726108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002203317,0.00001472282,0.0009316286,0.0002100906,0.00001602601,0.00008308877,0.0001628987,0.001104561,0.9897517,0.0003227695,0.0004523082,0.006729851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004555032,0.0001237807,0.005305534,0.00001706113,0.00001343195,0.00008819166,0.00008868987,0.002554245,0.9898442,0.0001017177,0.001841687,0.0000168611],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775254,0.001669257,0.00769528,0.0001983834,0.00008801599,0.00005535605,0.002626448,0.0004318855,0.009709995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907358,0.0009802523,0.002615622,0.00006876783,0.00001833079,0.0001090649,0.002198744,0.00009427348,0.00317916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005694713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01905072,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01760058339126747,"score_gpt":0.1931789057051996,"score_spread":0.1755783223139321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}