{"id":"W2318567786","doi":"10.1109/ccdc.2014.6852516","title":"Quasi-harmonic approach to non-holonomic robot motion control with concave obstacles avoidance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Holonomic; Collision avoidance; Mobile robot; Robot; Motion (physics); Harmonic; Control theory (sociology); Obstacle avoidance; Motion control; Collision; Computer science; Motion planning; Control (management); Physics; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Acoustics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000149875,0.0004135301,0.0003078795,0.0001920806,0.0002461265,0.0004069213,0.0005577769,0.0002811436,0.001166327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003897363,0.0001872569,0.0002497866,0.0001387428,0.0005689239,0.0003770897,0.0005685819,0.0003643368,0.0001562777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000288868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003150916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001279886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001057087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999124,0.00001941506,0.00000258749,0.00001436011,0.00003939666,0.00001180839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998796,0.00004870737,0.00002113,0.00001330316,0.00002695567,0.00001034143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008517634,0.00004157907,0.0005102588,0.0001783204,0.00005093319,0.0002976318,0.0002949302,0.7774093,0.03189813,0.1224277,0.001061872,0.06574409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005697977,0.00007320168,0.0001951695,0.000003660817,0.000004607779,0.00004076903,0.00002614134,0.9852234,0.001425221,0.01174317,0.001250735,0.000008242794],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01524158,0.0001377044,0.9807523,0.00006860086,0.00003248833,0.00001822188,0.000007915057,0.00005977018,0.003681321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9035349,0.0003348546,0.08769868,0.00007610383,0.00005697729,0.00007622267,0.00002621184,0.00004040896,0.008155691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001279886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00390172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01127187399936001,"score_gpt":0.212573335984033,"score_spread":0.201301461984673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}