{"id":"W2318771047","doi":"10.5026/jgeography.114.2_223","title":"Pseudotachylyte and Chondrule as a Reliable Recorder of Ancient Magnetic Field","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)","topic":"Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remanence; Chondrule; Protolith; Paleomagnetism; Geology; Magnetic field; Astrobiology; Rock magnetism; Ferromagnetism; Silicate; Materials science; Mineralogy; Geochemistry; Meteorite; Chondrite; Condensed matter physics; Geophysics; Magnetization; Chemistry; Physics; Metamorphic rock","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003128253,0.0002064982,0.000333304,0.0002003548,0.00008950258,0.00002670358,0.0002295557,0.0001439379,0.0001373978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009241711,0.0001788146,0.0002462377,0.0001861479,0.0001401731,0.00001569346,0.0001105759,0.0001889084,0.000005629925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003204257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005600836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005530558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007483424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998598,0.00004888164,0.0005417323,0.0002388622,0.0002632339,0.0003093343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989437,0.00003494427,0.0003615076,0.000275506,0.0002279272,0.0001563805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001079464,0.0006524065,0.5275583,0.0002123965,0.0004155501,0.00005283581,0.0003964995,0.0001464978,0.3445686,0.0001725424,0.05177856,0.07296627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003240727,0.01537941,0.5726058,0.0002069361,0.0003046405,0.0008227745,0.0006057554,0.00003993481,0.06149204,0.0004299853,0.3441743,0.0006976625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528264,0.03898541,0.00006647722,0.0008743317,0.0002121215,0.0001188365,0.0000106152,0.000004898482,0.006900883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859,0.007428558,0.004786997,0.0007749309,0.0003572509,0.000004910733,0.000004295796,0.00001719696,0.0007258852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2923957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7291849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003653537148136021,"score_gpt":0.2161529294780303,"score_spread":0.2124993923298943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}