{"id":"W2319066886","doi":"10.5751/es-06883-190344","title":"A conceptual framework to evaluate human-wildlife interactions within coupled human and natural systems","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Society","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Conceptual framework; Natural (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Human systems engineering; Environmental ethics; Geography; Human–wildlife conflict; Conceptual model; Ecology; Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental science; Sociology; Biology; Archaeology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02839767,0.002571053,0.001746101,0.008987866,0.002602196,0.008358493,0.005338668,0.003058049,0.005487484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03341982,0.0007534038,0.003128757,0.005888305,0.009288206,0.008997912,0.006322744,0.003491057,0.0005327762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01063219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01012999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01657831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859389,0.009859157,0.000768989,0.001078208,0.001834836,0.0005198632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816979,0.01117403,0.002089129,0.0008468822,0.002725038,0.001467046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003494027,0.000145361,0.004494086,0.0003582275,0.0002630007,0.0001299049,0.001232749,0.04432243,0.0003096693,0.9309619,0.002841112,0.01490661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006153843,0.0002691046,0.002759912,0.0006161119,0.0001823395,0.0001824393,0.00316875,0.1213498,0.0002880201,0.8508819,0.02013906,0.0001009707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02605888,0.004753576,0.9131904,0.01174085,0.0004680604,0.0009562218,0.001317828,0.0003067897,0.04120728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4671245,0.001861787,0.5252962,0.0008472539,0.0002050904,0.002458042,0.0008330365,0.00008600978,0.001288001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02839767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.150183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01477275609743153,"score_gpt":0.2763221259145723,"score_spread":0.2615493698171408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}